To Tweet or Not To Tweet During a Disaster?

Yes, only a small percentage of tweets generated during a disaster are directly relevant and informative for disaster response. No, this doesn’t mean we should dismiss Twitter as a source for timely, disaster-related information. Why? Because our efforts ought to focus on how that small percentage of informative tweets can be increased. What incentives or policies can be put in place? The following tweets by the Filipino government may shed some light.

Gov Twitter Pablo

The above tweet was posted three days before Typhoon Bopha (designated Pablo locally) made landfall in the Philippines. In the tweet below, the government directly and publicly encourages Filipinos to use the #PabloPH hashtag and to follow the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical & Astronomical Services Admin-istration (PAGASA) twitter feed, @dost_pagasa, which has over 400,000 follow-ers and also links to this official Facebook page.

Gov Twitter

The government’s official Twitter handle (@govph) is also retweeting tweets posted by The Presidential Communications Development and Strategic Plan-ning Office (@PCDCSO). This office is the “chief message-crafting body of the Office of the President.” In one such retweet (below), the office encourages those on Twitter to use different hashtags for different purposes (relief vs rescue). This mimics the use of official emergency numbers for different needs, e.g., police, fire, Ambulance, etc.

Twitter Pablo Gov

Given this kind of enlightened disaster response leadership, one would certainly expect that the quality of tweets received will be higher than without government endorsement. My team and I at QCRI are planning to analyze these tweets to de-termine whether or not this is the case. In the meantime, I expect we’ll see more examples of self-organized disaster response efforts using these hashtags, as per the earlier floods in August, which I blogged about here: Crowdsourcing Crisis Response following the Philippine Floods. This tech-savvy self-organization dynamic is important since the government itself may be unable to follow up on every tweeted request.

15 responses to “To Tweet or Not To Tweet During a Disaster?

  1. Pingback: Analyzing Disaster Tweets from Thailand Floods | iRevolution

  2. Pingback: Death Toll Rises From Typhoon in Philippines - NYTimes.com

  3. Pingback: Digital Humanitarian Response to Typhoon Pablo in Philippines | iRevolution

  4. Pingback: Summary: Digital Disaster Response to Philippine Typhoon | iRevolution

  5. This is a very valid topic. It is not bad to tweet but many times these social platforms give rise to rumors. The best thing would be if we can organize the disaster responses effectively using these sites.

  6. Pingback: Analyzing Tweets Posted During Australia’s Worst Bushfires | iRevolution

  7. Pingback: Debating The Value of Tweets For Disaster Response (Intelligently) | iRevolution

  8. Pingback: Digital Disaster Response to Typhoon Pablo – News Watch

  9. Pingback: Tech Talk: Breakout year for social media in emergencies « Red Cross Talks

  10. Pingback: The Problem with Crisis Informatics Research | iRevolution

  11. Pingback: To Tweet or Not To Tweet During a Disaster? | usDART

  12. Pingback: Social Media for Emergency Management: Question of Supply and Demand | iRevolution

  13. Pingback: What is Big (Crisis) Data? | iRevolution

  14. Pingback: Summary: Digital Disaster Response to Philippine Typhoon | The Standby Task Force

  15. Pingback: The Filipino Government’s Official Strategy on Crisis Hashtags | iRevolution

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s